|
|
|
|
It’s Miller Time (Or Why are Democrats so Zell-ous?)
by Aaron Goldstein
1 September 2004
The one person speaking
at the Republican National Convention who may raise the ire of Democrats,
aside from President Bush, is Democrat Zell Miller.
|
|
The one person speaking
at the Republican National Convention that may raise the ire of Democrats
aside from President Bush is -- a Democrat. The one person speaking
at the Republican National Convention that may be the most conservative of
them all aside from President Bush is -- a Democrat.
I am, of course, referring to Zell Miller, the Democratic Senator from Georgia
who is retiring from public office. Over the past four years, few in
the Senate have been more supportive of President Bush than Miller.
Indeed, one could argue that Bush could count on Miller’s support more reliably
than from some of his GOP colleagues. Whether it is the War on Terror
or tax cuts, Miller has stood steadfast with President Bush.
Not surprisingly, there is little love lost between Zell Miller and the Democratic
Party. They are happy that he is retiring from public life, even though it
is very likely that Georgians will send Republican Johnny Isaakson to the
Senate.
However, it is worth remembering that Miller was a keynote speaker at another
political convention in New York. In 1992, Miller sung the praises
of Bill Clinton as a keynote speaker at the Democratic National Convention.
Miller and Clinton knew each other well as fellow Democratic Governors from
Southern states.
So what happened?
To answer that question it would be best to look at Senator Miller’s book A National Party No More – The Conscience of a Conservative Democrat.
Released in 2003, Miller straightforwardly explains his support for Bush
while insisting that he will remain a Democrat for life, even after taking
his “own Party to the woodshed.”
While many Democrats view Miller with disdain, it would be an education for
them to read the third chapter of the book titled, “Born a Democrat -- Married
a Democrat.” In explaining himself, he recalls his roots in the Appalachian
Mountains:
I
would no more think of changing parties than I would think of changing my
name. To change would be like walking on my mother’s grave. Her
maiden name was Birdie Bryan, and she took pride that we may have been related
to the old Democratic warhorse, William Jennings Bryan. It doesn’t
matter that we’re not. Political heritage was important in the Appalachian
Mountains where Georgia, North and South Carolina, and Tennessee come together.
Politics
there wasn’t simply a political-year pastime. It was extremely
serious business that divided neighbors and caused feuds. Sometimes,
lives were lost because of it…In those days, Democrats bought gasoline only
at service stations owned by Democrats, and Republicans shopped only at stores
owned by Republicans. Parents in Democratic families frowned on their
offspring marrying or even dating Republicans and vice versa. Last
names immediately told one the party to which a person belonged. All
Taylors, Brysons, Dentons, Carvers, Plotts and Millers were Democrats; all
the Corns, Wests, Shooks, Woods and Berrys were Republicans.
Yet Miller
learned bipartisanship from his mother growing up in Young Harris, Georgia.
Widowed only seventeen days after Miller was born, Miller’s mother built
their house from stones in the Hiawassee River. The house took many
years to build and did not have a wood heater until Miller was in high school.
“To this day, warmth is a luxury to me that I don’t expect others to understand,”
recalls Miller.
Because of his mother’s situation and her perseverance and self-reliance,
she won the respect of her neighbors -- Democrat and Republican alike.
She would serve on the Young Harris City Council for more than a quarter
century and was twice elected mayor, becoming one of the first women to serve
in that capacity in Georgia.
Miller believes that the Democratic Party has ceased to be a national party
because of its alienation from the South. He believes a tell tale sign
of this was Al Gore’s inability to win a single southern state in 2000, including
his home state of Tennessee. Gore, of course, was not the first
Democrat to lose all the Southern states in a Presidential election.
George McGovern and Walter Mondale were shut out in the South in 1972 and
1984. But then again, McGovern and Mondale were shut out everywhere.
Had Gore won his home state he would have been elected President.
Never mind about Florida. Miller believes that Democrats on the national
level are out of their element when it comes to the South:
National
Democratic leaders are as nervous as a long-tailed cat around a rocking chair
when they travel south or get out in rural America. They have no idea
what to say or how to act. I once saw one try to eat a boiled shrimp
without peeling it. Talk about crunchy. Another one loudly gagged
on the salty taste of country ham.
If
Southern voters think you don’t understand them -- or even worse, much worse,
if they think you look down on them -- they will never vote for you.
Folks in the South have a simple way of saying this: “He’s not one of us.”
When a politician hears those words, he’s already dead.
Miller
argues that there is a difference between disagreement and disdain.
He believes those politicians commit “political suicide” if they appear intolerant
of people’s values. This was certainly the case with Howard Dean when
he spoke of Southerners with Confederate Flags and guns in their pick up
trucks. That was the start of the downward spiral that culminated into
a primal scream in Iowa.
At the time of this book’s release, Dean was the frontrunner in the Democratic
field. Consequently, Miller had very little to say about John Kerry.
The only mention of Kerry in the book occurs when he comments on Kerry’s
photo in Vogue magazine, where Kerry is wearing a blue wet suit with
a surfboard under his arm. Miller asks, “Are there more surfboards
or shotguns in America?” Miller says even less about fellow
Southerner John Edwards.
But that may be to Miller’s credit. After all, too many Democrats are
good at telling people why they oppose something but not so good at telling
people why they support something, if they support anything at all.
While Miller has been a strong supporter of the Bush tax cuts, the “straw
that broke the old camel’s back” took place in the run-up to the 2002 mid-term
elections over the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security.
Democrats objected to President Bush’s authority to bypass the Byzantine
procedures of the Civil Service to move government employees in times of
national emergency. Of course, all Presidents for the past 120 years
have had such authority, and Miller took his party to task for making it
an election issue. At a press conference on September 19, 2002 Miller
warned:
Of
all the many things for my party to have a knock-down, drag out fight over,
the issue of national security is absolutely the worst. I can think
of a no more unattractive picture our party could have projected six weeks
out from an election. We are not doing our party any good by feeding
the perception that Democrats are undermining the president of the United
States on terrorism. And to Joe Six Pack in that Wal-Mart parking lot,
that’s exactly what we’re doing.
On November
5, 2002, the Joe Six Packs of this country re-elected a Republican House
of Representatives, gave control of the Senate back to the Republicans and
also gave Republicans a majority of the gubernatorial seats and a majority
of the state legislatures. Zell Miller didn’t take the Democratic Party
to the woodshed. The American people did.
Miller believes that the Democratic Party may be headed the way of the Whig
Party of the 1850s. I am not so sure about that.
One cannot deny that the country is strongly polarized. The Democrats
may not be strong in the South but they are a force in the Northeast, the
West, as well as some key Southwestern and Midwestern states. The Democrats
are not going away anytime soon.
Nevertheless, the days of John F. Kennedy getting greater support in Georgia
than in Massachusetts are long gone. The Democratic Party of John Forbes
Kerry is far removed from the Democratic Party of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Kennedy did not hesitate to stand up to threats from the Soviet Union.
Kerry does not know whether to stand up or sit down.
Certainly, Zell Miller is not the only Democrat to support President Bush.
Indeed, there are Democrats from outside the South who support Bush.
They include former New York City Mayor Ed Koch; Randy Kelly, the current
mayor of St. Paul, Minnesota and actor Ron Silver, who in 2000 was a strong
supporter of Bill Bradley’s bid for the White House. Koch, Kelly and
Silver, unlike Miller, tend to disagree with Bush on most of his domestic
policies. However, like Miller, they have concluded that the government’s
most important obligation is national security, and that the Democratic Party
has not adequately addressed the matter, much less put forth a cohesive alternative.
They also believe that politics should end at the water’s edge. Too
many Democrats would toss President Bush into the creek without leaving themselves
a paddle.
Yet I believe that there are more 9/11 liberals or Bush Democrats out there
than many might suspect. These are people who believe that there are
some things more important than Democrat vs. Republican. Like Zell
Miller, they are Democrats and always will be. Like Zell Miller, they
are also Americans first and foremost as are their children. In a tight
Presidential race, they make the difference for both President Bush and the
future of our country.
A National Party No More is available on Amazon.com.
Aaron Goldstein, a former member of the socialist New Democratic Party, writes poetry and has a chapbook titled Oysters and the Newborn Child: Melancholy and Dead Musicians. His poetry can be viewed on www.poetsforthewar.org.
Email Aaron Goldstein
Send
this Article to a Friend
|
|