|
|
|
|
Goldman’s $105 Oil Prediction a Little Too Slick
by Noel Sheppard
05 April 2005
One day the public is going to wake up and realize that when
analysts are telling them to buy things at all-time highs, it might be time
to sell.
|
|
The day
after a government report showed that crude oil inventories have risen to
their highest levels since July 2002, the esteemed Wall Street brokerage
firm, Goldman Sachs, released an analysis forecasting a continued increase
in energy prices that could result in oil hitting $105 per barrel.
As reported by Reuters:
"We
believe oil markets may have entered the early stages of what we have referred
to as a ‘super spike’ period -- a multi-year trading band of oil prices high
enough to meaningfully reduce energy consumption and recreate a spare capacity
cushion only after which will lower energy prices return," Goldman's analysts
wrote.
Oddly, according to Bloomberg, the Energy Department had this to say just 24 hours earlier:
“Stockpiles
gained 5.4 million barrels, or 1.7 percent, to 314.7 million in the week
ended March 25, the biggest increase since October, the report showed. Supplies
are 9 percent higher than a year ago.”
This
begs the question: Why would one of the most respected brokerage firms
in the nation make such a prediction when the inventory data is suggesting
the oil shortage that has been squeezing prices higher for the past twelve
months seems to be waning?
Well, as the Chicago Board of Options Exchange Oil Index
indicates, energy stocks have been going almost straight up since May 2003.
In fact, this index has risen by more than 100% during this period.
This compares to only a 33% increase in the S&P 500, and about a 45%
rise in the NASDAQ 100.
What this means is that energy stocks have been the most exciting investment
game on Wall Street for the past two years. Moreover, just look at
what they’ve done so far this year -- up an amazing 18%. By contrast, the S&P 500 is down 2.5%, and the NASDAQ is down 8%.
Given this, if you ran a brokerage firm, would you want this party to end?
Wouldn’t you do anything within your power to extend the merriment as long
as possible?
To better understand just how hot energy stocks have been of late, and why
securities companies across the globe have such a vested interest in keeping
oil prices from falling, one only needs to look at the frenzy for oil related
initial public offerings that has occurred in England recently. According
to an article published by Bloomberg a few weeks ago:
On
March 14, Afren Plc., a new oil and gas company, listed its shares on the
London exchange at 20 pence each. By lunchtime, they had jumped to more than
56 pence, almost tripling in just a few hours.”
White
Nile is an exploration company set up by the former England cricket star
Phil Edmonds. Listed on the London market at the start of February, the shares
increased more than 11-fold in a week before being suspended.”
Centurion
Energy International Inc., which develops oil assets in Tunisia, has seen
its share price rise from just 52 pence in 2003 to a high of 780 pence last
month.
Sound
a bit like what was happening to Internet, dot-com, and technology stocks
in the first quarter of 2000? Do you remember what brokerage firms
and their analysts were saying then? These stocks were all going to
just keep going higher, and higher, and higher, right?
Well, ladies and gentlemen, Caveat Emptor: The time has come for Americans
to be fully educated as to how the brokerage community works.
Having been employed by one of Goldman Sachs’ major competitors for eight years, I know full well that the primary modus operandi of such firms is to sell product. Period. And, the easiest product to sell is that which is already in the news.
Think back to the first quarter of 2000. Why was it so easy for brokerage
firms to suck innocent and inexperienced investors into technology stocks
as they were not only reaching their peaks, but trading at levels that equities
never had in our nation’s history?
Well, because every day, newspapers and television stations would proudly
broadcast the new high the NASDAQ had hit. And, they would talk about
the new IPO that had just come to market, and how it had quadrupled on its
first day of trading.
So, when a high-profile analyst from a high-profile firm came out and raised his price target for XYZ.com, the unwitting masses couldn’t get to their phones or computers fast enough to jump in headfirst.
The same thing is going on right now in energy stocks. On a daily basis,
the public is being bombarded with talk of $3 gas, and pending rolling blackouts.
So, when a high-profile firm like Goldman Sachs comes out with a $105 per
barrel oil prediction, it shouldn’t be surprising that the CBOE Oil Index
jumped by 1.3% on the announcement.
For myself, I can only hope that the public is going to one day wake up and
realize that when analysts are telling them to buy things at all-time highs,
it might be time to sell.
Noel Sheppard is a business owner, economist, and writer residing in Northern California.
Email Noel Sheppard
Send
this Article to a Friend
|
|