|
|
|
|
Ken Livingstone is no Rudy Giuliani
by Aaron Goldstein
11 July 2005
London Mayor Ken Livingstone has
a friendly relationship with Yusuf al Qaradawi, a Muslim scholar in Qatar
who broadcasts on al-Jazeera.
|
|
I awoke Thursday
morning to an announcement on the radio that there were bombings in London.
No sooner than that had been said they moved on to the weather. Immediately,
I turned on my TV to the Fox News Channel and then my heart sank.
I was now fully awake.
London was my home for nearly half of 1995. It was my last year as
an undergraduate at Carleton University. I had traveled to London to
work as a Parliamentary Intern and ended up serving two Labour Members of
Parliament (MP). First, I worked for Tessa Jowell, a MP for Dulwich,
which is situated in the southern part of London. She is now Secretary
of State of Culture, Media & Sport in the Blair government. I later
moved on to Jimmy Wray, a MP from Glasgow who retired from politics prior
to this year’s general election.
While in London, I lived in a hostel on Great Portland Street directly across
from Tube (the nickname for the London Underground) station of the same name,
only a few stops away from King’s Cross -- one of the Underground stations
that was hit. To the left of the hostel, Great Portland Street was
met by Marylebone Road on the left and Euston Road on the right. I
was only a few steps away from Regents Park. If you walked the length
of Regents Park, you would hit the London Zoo. On the corner of Marylebone
and Baker Street was Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museum. Walk to the other
end of Great Portland Street and you hit Oxford Street, one of London’s busiest
shopping districts. If you took a right on Oxford and then a
left one would end up in Piccadilly Circus. Not far from Piccadilly
Circus, there was Leceister Square -- the heart of the entertainment district.
I remember seeing both Phantom of the Opera and Les Misérables
there. The movie theaters were also interesting. There was assigned
seating. No movie would commence without the seal of approval from
the British Board of Film Classification. Leceister Square, too, was
hit.
On a Sunday, I would usually end up walking to Hyde Park and watch the activities
at Speaker’s Corner or amble further down to the Serpentine, sometimes via
Oxford or Baker or even in a round about way around Edgware Road. Of
course, one was immediately struck by how many Muslims were out and about,
especially Pakistanis. Edgware Road, too, was hit.
I have not been back to London since 1995 but I will not soon forget my time
there. While I was there, Great Britain commemorated the 50th anniversary
of V-E Day. The thoughts of many people were not so much on the liberation
of Europe from the Nazis but how Londoners (including the Royal Family) soldiered
on after getting hit by the Germans night after night, and having to endure
the rationing of food, clothing and other goods. Yet they
were determined not to see Britain fall to the Nazis.
I then saw London’s Mayor Ken Livingstone come on TV and speak live from
Singapore via Sky News (a sister station of the Fox News Channel).
His remarks were stern, direct and to the point:
I
know that you personally do not fear giving up your own life in order to
take others -- that is why you are so dangerous. But I know you fear
that you may fail in your long-term objective to destroy our free society
and I can show you why you will fail.
In
the days that follow look at our airports, look at our sea ports and look
at our railway stations and, even after your cowardly attack, you will see
that people from the rest of Britain, people from around the world will arrive
in London to become Londoners and fulfill their dreams and achieve their
potential.
They
choose to come to London, as so many have come before because they come to
be free, they come to live the life they choose, they come to be able to
be themselves. They flee you because you tell them how they should
live. They don’t want that and nothing you do, however many of us you
kill, will stop that flight to our city where freedom is strong and where
people can live in harmony with one another. Whatever you do, however
many you kill, you will fail.
Livingstone’s
remarks may have provided some reassurance as Rudy Giuliani did for New York
City (and indeed for the rest of America) on 9/11. But Ken Livingstone
is no Rudy Giuliani. Livingstone was the Leader of the
Greater London Council between 1981 and 1986 and was a vociferous critic
of Margaret Thatcher. The Greater London Council would print the unemployment
rate on banners that could be seen from Westminster. In 1986, Thatcher
would abolish the Greater London Council. Livingstone was elected to
the House of Commons in 1987 and was part of the Socialist Caucus (as was
Jimmy Wray). He served in the Commons until he ran for mayor of London
in 2000 and won resoundingly. Livingstone would be expelled from the
Labour Party because he ran against the Labour Party candidate, Frank Dobson.
Livingstone was re-elected in 2004, this time with the blessing of Labour.
This is the same Ken Livingstone who said of President Bush in May 2003:
I
think George Bush is the most corrupt American president since Harding in
the Twenties. He is not the legitimate president. This really
is a completely unsupportable government and I look forward to it being overthrown
as much as I looked forward to Saddam Hussein being overthrown.
It is worth considering two other points. During his statement from Singapore he said:
I
want to say one thing specifically to the world today. This was not
a terrorist attack against the mighty and the powerful. It was not
aimed at Presidents or Prime Ministers. It was aimed at ordinary, working-class
Londoners, black and white, Muslim and Christian, Hindu and Jew, young and
old. It was an indiscriminate attempt to slaughter, irrespective of
any considerations for age, for class, for religion, or whatever.
So is
Livingstone saying it would have been all right if the attack had been directed
at “the mighty and the powerful?” Would he be down with an assassination
of Bush and Blair?
It is a question worth asking because of this second point. Livingstone
has a friendly relationship with Yusuf al Qaradawi, a Muslim scholar in Qatar
who has a show on al-Jazeera. When al Qardawi visited London in July
2004, Livingstone described him as a “moderate.” This despite the fact
that al Qardawi said he considered Palestinian suicide bombers as “an evidence
of G-d’s justice.” Livingstone himself acknowledges as much and yet
praises al Qaradawi as one “who has no personal involvement in violence of
any kind,” and then proceeds to rip Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon,
without naming him. In a pamphlet titled, “Why the Mayor of London
will maintain dialogues with all of London’s faiths and communities: a reply
to the dossier against the Mayor’s meeting with Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawi,” Livingstone
argues:
He
(al Qardawi) takes the view that in specific circumstances of that conflict,
where Israel is using modern missiles, tanks and planes in civilian areas
to perpetuate the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands, it is justified
for Palestinians to turn their bodies into weapons.
Some
supporters of the present policies of the Israeli government argue that on
these grounds alone Dr. al-Qaradawi should be excluded from Britain and denied
a platform. I disagree. I condemn all violence in Israel and
Palestine but no purpose will be served by refusing to speak to either the
Israeli or Palestinian sides.
Indeed,
it would be impossible to refuse to speak to a person like Dr. al-Qaradawi
who has no personal involvement in violence of any kind, but at the same
time speak to an Israeli government, which kills Palestinian civilians with
modern weapons every week. That government is, moreover, headed
by a person whom groups like Human Rights Watch have suggested should be
investigated for war crimes as a result of his responsibility as Israel’s
Defence Minister in the cold blooded massacre of more than 800 unarmed Palestinian
civilians at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camp in 1982, during the Israeli
invasion of Lebanon.
Can you
believe this garbage was paid for by the taxpayers who live under the Greater
London Authority? Evidently it is all right to praise suicide bombers
as long as one does not engage in it oneself. And why would al Qaradawi?
He would have no platform. No television show on al-Jazeera.
Livingstone
likens Israeli soldiers who in the course of defending human life accidentally
kill civilians as far worse than Palestinian suicide bombers who seek to
kill as many civilians as possible. For good measure, Livingstone
declares that Israel is illegally occupying Palestinian lands. Even
UN Resolutions 242 and 338 do not specifically identify what “territories”
are to be returned to the Palestinians and they will only do so when Israel’s
borders are secure. If that is not enough, Livingstone insinuates that
Ariel Sharon was responsible for the killing of Palestinian civilians by
Lebanese Druze sympathetic to Israel. Yet Livingstone said nothing
of the Syrian occupation of Lebanon. He said nothing of Palestinian
state run television that incites violence against Jews.
Why was Livingstone allowed to rejoin the Labour Party last year?
Not surprisingly, Livingstone dismissed criticism of al Qaradawi, blaming
it on the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI). Livingstone
described MEMRI as “very well funded” and having been “set up by a former
senior officer in Israel’s military intelligence service.” London’s
mayor described MEMRI’s approach as being “reminiscent of the various anti-Semitic
conspiracy theories” while engaging in anti-Semitism himself by insinuating
that the Jews control MEMRI and therefore its information cannot be trusted.
I suspect that Livingstone will keep his distance from the likes of al-Qaradawi
for the time being. Or at the very least he will be more circumspect
with his audiences. Livingstone had to say what he said.
He is not in a position to be foolish like the newly returned MP George Galloway,
who blamed the attacks on Tony Blair. (Incidentally, I was introduced
to Galloway by Jimmy Wray one night. Of course, this was long before
I was aware of Galloway’s association with Saddam Hussein). Livingstone
is in a position where he must govern a city and now that the city he is
governing has been attacked cannot afford to make such reckless statements.
At least for now.
In time, Livingstone will go back to blaming Israel for the world’s ills.
He will slander President Bush. He will call for British withdrawal
from Afghanistan and Iraq. Rudy Giuliani, on the other hand, has supported
our efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq, has stood with President Bush and does
not blame Israel for the ills of the world. One would think that this
would not be a popular position to take in Britain. Yet it did not
prevent the Royal Family from knighting Giuliani. Hopefully, the Royal
Family will not contemplate a similar ceremony for Livingstone.
Aaron Goldstein, a former member of the socialist New Democratic Party, writes poetry and has a chapbook titled Oysters and the Newborn Child: Melancholy and Dead Musicians. His poetry can be viewed on www.poetsforthewar.org.
Email Aaron Goldstein
Send
this Article to a Friend
|
|