The quick selection
of federal circuit court judge Samuel Alito, Jr. is precisely what the doctor
ordered. The perception of the American people is that President Bush
has switched his strategy from picking a crony whose opinions were a private
secret and who intended to “please” (in a condescending sort of way) a constituency,
in this case women, and that he is now picking a serious, thoughtful jurist
in the mold of Chief Justice John Roberts.
The Left could not stop Roberts, and, unable to stop Roberts, they will not
be able to stop Alito. That leaves Leftists with two unappealing alternatives.
First, they can essentially roll over, play dead, allow President Bush to
win a victory just when his presidency seemed to be weakening, place a young
conservative justice on the Supreme Court in place of an older “moderate,”
and demoralize their base.
Second, they can view the Roberts confirmation process as a “mistake” and
go all out against Alito. Let us hope they choose this course.
Senators who have in the past voted to confirm Alito into high judicial and
legal jobs will not have to say that their votes were wrong then (or now.)
This is always awkward and sometimes absurd.
Leftists also seem to live in 1964, when America, they believe, forever and
utterly rejected “ultra-conservatism” (never mind the fact that Barry Goldwater
received a standing ovation from the entire Republican convention in 1968
and was elected to the Senate soon thereafter, with fawning praise even from
the Left.)
As I pointed out in a recent article, and as I have pointed out in many articles
over the last four years, Question D3 of the Battleground Poll, a periodic
and thoroughly bipartisan poll, has shown the number of Americans who call
themselves “conservative” or “very conservative” has held steady at between
fifty-nine and sixty-one percent of the electorate, while those who call
themselves “liberal” or “very liberal” has never bumped above thirty-five
percent.
The fastest growing group of Americans, in fact, are those who call themselves
“very conservative,” which has increased more than fifty percent in three
years. The Left will always lose a battle for the hearts and minds of Americans
when the lines are drawn in clear ideological terms, which is not only why
Reagan won twice easily but that John Kerry got all misty-eyed in front of
the cameras at the funeral of the Gipper.
Moreover, if Americans in general are conservatives, states are even more
conservative, and states are the electoral districts of senators. Because
so many Leftists are in a few big states like California, New York, Illinois
and New Jersey -- which have the same number of senators as Alaska, Wyoming
and South Dakota -- that sixty-three to thirty-seven percent advantage in
the general electorate is more like a seventy to thirty percent advantage
in states, which translates into a huge advantage in senate seats if the
ideological distinction remains clear.
Completing all this more for Leftists is that Alito comes from a federal
circuit that has three potentially important Senate races next year -- Maryland,
New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Voting against him will be relatively
unpopular in those states, just like voting against a native son is always
relatively unpopular.
If Corzine is elected Governor of New Jersey, his successor will be vulnerable
and a vote against Alito could make that race very competitive.
Maryland,
with Lieutenant Governor Steele, promises to be competitive anyway.
Steele can ask any opponent whether he would have voted to confirm Alito
or not, and any answer will cost that candidate votes or intensity of support
among his supporters.
Casey in Pennsylvania will almost have to say that he would vote for Alito:
he and his late father were both pro-life. But that very fact may demoralize
some of his supporters, while it will not cost Santorum a single vote.
If Casey flips, if he says that he might vote against Alito, then that will
cost him even more heavily.
Was selecting Miers a disaster, then? Perhaps. There is another
possibility, however: even conservatives may have “mis-underestimated”
President Bush. Alito looks so great by comparison to Miers that all
the initial news about the qualifications and temperament of Alito will be
positive. Could it be that Miers was intended to befuddle the Left?
Stranger things have happened.
Bruce Walker's articles can be found at the Conservative Truth.
Email Bruce Walker
Send
this Article to a Friend