|
|
|
|
The First Black Congressman in the House
by Winkfield F. Twyman, Jr.
12 December 2005
On December 12, 1870, Joseph Hayne Rainey took an oath
of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of
America.
|
|
December 12 is a
day for celebration. On this day in 1870, Joseph Hayne Rainey took an oath
of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of
America. The eyes of a nation were upon this former slave, the son of a South
Carolina barber. When Rainey completed his oath, history was made and the
U.S. House of Representatives moved a step closer to the dream that all men
are created equal.
Who was Joseph Hayne Rainey?
Born
on June 21, 1832, Rainey was born into a harsh world of little hope. Over
90% of blacks were slaves. Those African-Americans who were not slaves had
poor prospects. If they tried to learn how to read, they were in violation
of state law. Many occupations like medicine, law and public office were
off-limits. Consigned to the economic margins of society, a number of free
blacks left South Carolina for greater freedoms up North, in Canada, or out
West. Those free blacks that remained disturbed the racial order at their
own peril.
Within
this oppressive system grew the seeds of uplift. Rainey’s father, Edward
Rainey, was a slave. But he was also blessed with a trade. He could cut hair.
And he had ambition. He wanted freedom for himself, and his family. Edward
did what all later-day immigrants would recognize and respect. He created
a plan. He would save his money from his earnings as a slave until he had
saved enough to purchase the freedom of his family.
History
does not record the reaction of Edward’s slave master. But the master must
have liked the grit that he saw in Edward’s enterprise. From sunup to sundown,
Edward worked and worked cutting hair. Finally, the day arrived when Edward
had saved up enough money. The master kept his word and the Raineys were
now free.
Freedom
did not guarantee security, especially for a black family in the antebellum
South. Edward had succeeded once, however, and would not be deterred. He
opened up a barbershop, continued to cut hair, and saved his money. With
his earnings, he purchased a house which stands today in Georgetown, South
Carolina. He taught his son, Joseph, the barbering trade so that he too could
provide for himself as an adult. In time, Edward became the wealthiest
African-American in Georgetown, an achievement that inspired his son to take
control of his own destiny in life.
The family
moved to Charleston where Joseph worked as a barber in the Mill House. The
Mill House operates as a hotel to this day. One can walk the halls and feel
the weight of Southern history all about you, whether it be the portraits
of plantations or confederate soldiers in their gray uniforms. The
past hangs heavy in the air at the Mill House.
When
the Civil War began, the Confederate government faced an interesting conundrum
-- what to do with its free blacks? Neither citizen nor slave, these men
and women of color occupied a precarious place in the rebel mind. History
tells us that the ranks of free southern blacks were split during the Civil
War, a hard truth to accept in our modern time. Some free blacks cast their
lot with the north. They hoped for emancipation and, in some cases, volunteered
for the Union Army. Other free blacks had grown so accustomed to economic
relations with white benefactors that they supported the war effort and,
in some rare cases, volunteered their sons to fight for the rebel cause.
The Confederacy
drafted Joseph Rainey to work on fortifications. He resisted. Concluding
that his best interests were not served by digging ditches for rebels, Joseph
fled in the dead of night on a schooner for New York and then to his final
destination in Bermuda. Bermuda was an interesting choice for exile because,
while blacks had been free on the island since 1834, Bermuda was an English
colony and there were confederate sympathizers in the population.
Together
with his young wife Susan, the Raineys turned to enterprise. They set up
house in a room of the Tucker House, the official residence of the Bermuda
Governor. Rainey worked for a bit at a hotel before opening his barbershop
in their Tucker House room. Rainey became so successful that the lane behind
the room is now known as Barber’s Alley, a tribute to the high regard in
which Bermudans held Rainey. He became active in civic affairs and discovered
that he had a gift for leadership. Imagine the sight of a southern black
barber weighing in on issues of the day with English citizens. It must have
been a stirring scene during those war days. Rainey learned to read as well
during this time. A kind customer, Dr. Mingo, taught Joseph Rainey lessons
during haircuts. Rainey learned to read while standing on the job.
When
the Civil War ended, Joseph and Susan had made a comfortable life for themselves
in Bermuda. The couple might have ended their days happily in Bermuda were
it not for the pleas of Edward. Edward wrote Joseph. He asked Joseph
to return home. The father wrote about how it was a new day in South Carolina.
The Confederacy was dead and slavery with it, thus opening up unrivaled opportunities
for blacks. Edward could sense the potential in the air as he talked with
his white customers and fellow blacks. He urged Joseph to return home.
There was a political gold rush happening and now was the time to seize opportunity.
Joseph
read the letters by candlelight with interest. Union troops and freed slaves
seemed a world away from Joseph as he overheard British sailors strolling
down Barber’s Alley. He had made a life for himself in Bermuda. He had good
customers and kind friends of all races. Was he willing to give it all up
for a promise of better things to come back home? Joseph shared the letters
with Susan. She was not eager to return to the States. She had her own clothing
business, well respected for its elegance and fashion. Her roots were in
the French West Indies, so island life felt like home.
But the letters continued and Edward grew more insistent with each correspondence.
In a
fateful decision for our nation’s history, Joseph Rainey decided that his
father was right. Opportunity was on the horizon in South Carolina, more
so than he might ever enjoy in Bermuda, particularly since he was not a citizen
of either England or South Carolina. Black Americans would not gain their
citizenship until the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868.
Upon
his return to Georgetown, he moved into his father’s house at 909 Prince
Street and immediately plunged into the thick of things. Being the son of
the town’s richest black man must have helped his name recognition. And he
could read, an uncommon ability for a black man in 1865. Fewer then
3% of African-Americans could read.
He immediately
began to earn a reputation as an honest man of integrity with conservative
instincts. Voters elected him to the Constitutional Convention of 1868, where
he helped to draft one of the most progressive and forward-looking state
constitutions in history. He ran for the State Senate under the new Constitution
and was promptly elected. His Senate colleagues recognized his talents for
leadership and trustworthiness. As a result, he received appointment to the
State Senate Finance Committee where committee members elevated Rainey to
the chairmanship. He had come a long way from Barber’s Alley.
During this time of flux, new rules of racial status were being implemented
and tested. When blacks became citizens in 1868, there was seemingly no bar
to an African-American serving in the state militia. Rainey did so as a good
citizen and rose to the rank of Brigadier General, only the third black Brigadier
General in our nation’s history. Now that racial barriers were melting away,
raw talent could rise to the surface in South Carolinian life.
When
the U.S. House of Representatives declared the seat of Benjamin Whittemore
vacant in 1870, Rainey was a natural replacement. He had deep family roots
in Georgetown. As an African-American, he symbolized new citizenship for
black people. He had proven leadership experience at the state level, both
in civilian and military life. And he could read.
His election to Congress was at once foreseeable and historic.
Upon
taking his seat in Congress, Rainey demanded treatment equal to that of his
peers. A very proper man who never forgot his time in an English colony,
Rainey expected decorum and civility from whites. During debate
on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, he took to task high-minded whites who condoned
terrorism against Republicans, both white and black. Rainey did not claim
to be a constitutional lawyer. Rather, he spoke with blunt conviction about
constitutional values:
Tell me nothing of a constitution which fails to shelter beneath its rightful power the people of a country.
-- Congressional Globe, 42d Congress, 1st Session, 394-95.
Rainey had been a congressman for two months.
While
a member of Congress, he insisted upon equal treatment in streetcars and
other public accommodations. He exposed the segregation that he saw
with his own eyes in Richmond, Virginia streetcars. On one other occasion,
he was forcibly ejected from a streetcar because of race. He filed a lawsuit
to challenge the action but eventually was prevailed upon to withdrew the
suit. His private legal actions proceeded those of Homer Plessy (Plessy v. Ferguson) by over twenty years.
Rainey
was not immune from the daily humiliations of prejudice, even as a congressman.
While at the Willard Hotel, a popular watering hole for politicians in Washington,
a waiter charged Rainey 50 cents for a beer. Rainey noticed that the waiter
had charged white patrons 5 cents for the same beverage. “Am I charged 50
cents because of my race?” Rainey demanded to know. “Yes,” the waiter replied,
without missing a beat.
On another
occasion, Rainey observed that the City of Richmond had shown no regard for
deceased African-Americans and little for the living. Sometime in 1872 or
1873, Rainey was taken to the outskirts of the city where there was a slave
burial ground. To Rainey’s astonishment, he found the graveyard cut
through for the purpose of opening a street. The city carts hauled away the
dust of the dead slaves and strewed the dust about the streets to fill up
mud holes. Rainey was outraged! And he used the incident against southern
apologists on the floor of the House.
Rainey
grew in recognition as the 1870s wore on. As the most senior black member
of Congress, he played an important leadership role on the Freedmen’s Affairs,
Indian Affairs, Invalid Pensions, and Select Celebration of Proposed Census
of 1875 Committees. He became involved as an incorporator and stockholder
in various railroad companies and other enterprises, including a private
school for blacks. His career achieved another milestone in March 1874,
when he presided over the House as Speaker pro tempore, the first black to
do so.
The tension
between Rainey’s aspirations for equality and white prejudice crested in
debate over the 1875 Civil Rights Act. Opposition to the Act came primarily
from white southerners. Mindful that he was not a lawyer, Rainey would always
return to basic notions of fairness and decency. When a member of Congress
argued that men of quality like Frederick Douglas did not need “special protections”
under the Bill, Rainey shot back:
I
would like to ask the gentleman just one question before he sits down. Did
the talent and good conduct of Fred. Douglas enable him to sit at the same
table on the Potomac boat with his fellow-members of the San Domingo commission?
-- Representative
Joseph H. Rainey, responding on February 4, 1875, to an argument that the
Bill conferred “special protections” that men of quality, like Frederick
Douglass, did not need.
Another law-trained congressman from Kentucky lectured that the Civil Rights Bill was unconstitutional under the reasoning of The Slaughter-House Cases
and pernicious in that it gave “large numbers of colored persons” the opportunity
“to demand their rights in the most offensive form.” Rainey cut through the
legalese and framed the question in terms of humanity:
I
am not a lawyer, and consequently I cannot take a legal view of this
matter, or perhaps I cannot view it through the same optics that he does.
I view it in the light of the Constitution -- in the light of the amendments
that have been made to that Constitution; I view it in the light of humanity….
They
(southern white congressmen) have a feeling against the Negro in this country
that I suppose will never die out. They have an antipathy against that
race of people, because of their loyalty to this Government, and because
at the very time when they were needed to show manhood and valor they came
forward in defense of the flag of the country and assisted in crushing out
the rebellion. They, sir, would not give to the colored man the right
to vote or the right to enjoy any of those immunities which are enjoyed by
other citizens, if it had a tendency to make him feel his manhood and elevate
him above the ordinary way of life. So long as he makes himself
content with ordinary gifts, why all is well; but when he aspires to be a
man, when he seeks to have the rights accorded him that other citizens of
the country enjoy, then he is asking too much, and such gentleman as the
gentleman from Kentucky are not willing to grant it.
-- Representative Joseph H. Rainey speech, December 19, 1873
As the
U.S. Army withdrew from the South in the 1870s and Northern white support
for civil rights waned, black men were increasingly kept from the polls.
In 1876, South Carolina was one of three remaining states that still had
federal troops present, and that had not been taken over by white supremacists.
Some Democrats urged each white Democrat to prevent at least one black man
from voting through intimidation, bribery, or other means. Tensions came
to a boil in Hamburg, South Carolina on July 4, 1876. Two white farmers ordered
a black militia group to disperse so that the whites could pass. The black
militia group did disperse but only after angry words were exchanged.
Insulted
by this breach of racial protocol, one of the white farmers returned to Hamburg
and demanded that the judge arrest the black militia captain. The captain
railed against the judge for considering the demand. The captain was ordered
to stand trial for contempt of court on July 8. Both black militia members
and an armed group of whites converged on Hamburg. Fighting erupted and a
race riot ensued. Five of the black militia members were captured and murdered
in cold blood. The whites destroyed the black homes in Hamburg. The result
was a strengthened white supremacist wing of the Democratic Party that swept
the fall 1876 elections. The whites indicted for murder were never brought
to justice. Democratic officials dropped the case.
The Democratic sweep of the statehouse and the removal of federal troops
from South Carolina spelled the end of Rainey’s congressional career. While
Rainey won the 1876 election, white supremacists came at him with a full-fledged
campaign of intimidation and terrorism in the 1878 election. Rainey lost
his seat to a white Democrat.
During
the brave days of debate on the 1875 Civil Rights Act, Rainey had predicted
that South Carolina blacks would not be “redeemed” as had happened in Virginia,
North Carolina, and Georgia. Rainey said:
We
do not intend to be driven to the frontier as you have driven the Indian.
Our purpose is to remain in your midst as an integral part of the body politic.
We are training our children to take our places when we are gone.
-- Joseph H. Rainey, February 3, 1875
When
Rainey gave his farewell speech on March 3, 1879, he lamented the passing
of Reconstruction and whether “the savings of a few thousand or hundreds
of thousands of dollars (could) compensate for the loss of the political
heritage of American citizens?”
Rainey
never recovered from the political loss. The House leadership promised Rainey
a job as Clerk of the House. When he sought the position, however, the leadership
broke its promise. Rainey found work as an internal revenue agent.
After two years, he tried his hand at a brokerage business and failed. He
returned to Georgetown, a broken man. He attempted to run a mill and became
embittered, urging fellow blacks to leave the South. Susan began to sell
hats to help make ends meet. His father died in 1883 and Joseph lost the
will to carry on. He died penniless on August 2, 1887.
To this day, no one knows where he is buried.
Did mean-spirited
men build a bank and parking lot over his grave? Suspicions have lingered
in Georgetown that white supremacists had no regard for his resting place
in the Baptist cemetery. Was a bank constructed over his remains. Rainey
saw desecration of remains with his own eyes in the slave graveyard outside
Richmond, Virginia. Did it happen to this great American in Georgetown, South
Carolina? If Congress can honor Rainey’s memory with a portrait in the Capitol
Building, it can certainly honor his remains with an inquiry into the circumstances
surrounding his burial and possible disinterment.
Rainey’s
spirit lived on in his descendants. During debate on the 1875 Civil
Rights Bill, Rainey proclaimed that African-Americans were “training our
children to take our places when we are gone.” His grandson and namesake,
Joseph H. Rainey, III, would run for Congress in Philadelphia and almost
win. Philadelphia leaders urged his great-granddaughter, Valerie Rainey,
to run for Congress. If she had been successful, she would have been the
first black congresswoman. His great-great-grandaughters, Schuyler Rainey
and Ellyn Rainey, would work on Capitol Hill for Congressman Major R. Owens.
After
graduating with High Honors from the University of Virginia and Harvard Law
School, W. F. Twyman, Jr. worked at a major New York law firm, served on
the staffs of Congressmen Barney Frank and Henry B. Gonzalez, and taught
as a law professor for seven years. His publications include articles
in the South Carolina Law Review, the Virginia Tax Review, the National Black
Law Journal, the St. Croix Review, and the Intellectual Conservative.com.
Email Winkfield Twyman
Send
this Article to a Friend
|
|