<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; Alan Roebuck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/author/alan-roebuck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The False Gospel of Liberalism</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/02/01/the-false-gospel-of-liberalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/02/01/the-false-gospel-of-liberalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=7330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this gospel,&#160;liberals find both an intellectually plausible explanation for their unhappiness and psychological relief from knowing that they are now on the side of the angels.
<p>How can liberalism &#8212; an egregiously false and destructive worldview &#8211;&#160;be so wildly popular? Granted, some oddballs are attracted to an idea because it&#39;s false and destructive, but most [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/02/01/the-false-gospel-of-liberalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>183</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Against the Legal Left: An Open Letter to Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/20/the-case-against-the-legal-left-an-open-letter-to-law-professor-kermit-roosevelt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/20/the-case-against-the-legal-left-an-open-letter-to-law-professor-kermit-roosevelt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If equality is the highest good, then we must eventually allow anything to be called marriage. But if anything is marriage, then marriage equals non-marriage, and marriage has been destroyed.
<p>Dear Professor Roosevelt:</p>
<p>Your recent article in the Christian Science Monitor, &#34;California&#39;s Same-Sex Marriage Case Affects All of Us,&#34; presents a clear justification for leftist principles to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/20/the-case-against-the-legal-left-an-open-letter-to-law-professor-kermit-roosevelt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theism vs Atheism: What&#039;s at Stake</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/12/theism-vs-atheism-whats-at-stake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/12/theism-vs-atheism-whats-at-stake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless atheists&#160;can give an account of why naturalism is true,&#160;their arguments against God all fail, and&#160;they are left with agnosticism at best.
<p>My essay &#34;How to Respond to a Supercilious Atheist&#34; generated many responses from atheists and agnostics. Some were courteous, some were hostile, and a few were even supercilious.&#160; But none even came near to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/12/theism-vs-atheism-whats-at-stake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Reformation</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/06/conservative-reformation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/06/conservative-reformation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ideas of liberalism currently have effective control of America, so the conservative movement must deliberately instigate a war of ideas, with the aim of retaking intellectual control of the country.
<p></p>
<p>Yes, this title may appear pretentious. But just as the Protestant Reformation was a call for Christians to return to fundamental principles, so conservatism must [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/06/conservative-reformation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution 101</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/04/18/evolution-101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/04/18/evolution-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ. &#038; Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/04/18/evolution-101/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are sure there is no miracle-working God, then something like Darwinian evolution must be correct. But if there is even a chance that such a God exists, then basic intellectual integrity demands that you take seriously the criticisms directed against Darwinism.
<p>Ben Stein&#39;s movie Expelled shines the spotlight on the dispute between Darwinian evolution [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/04/18/evolution-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberalism 101</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/22/liberalism-101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/22/liberalism-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/22/liberalism-101/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We American conservatives are all, in a manner of speaking, recovering liberals, and we must constantly fight the temptation to relapse.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Conservatives, by definition, oppose liberalism.&#160; And well they should, because liberalism, with its foolish utopian schemes based on false or impractical understandings of equality, liberty and tolerance, is inflicting serious, possibly fatal harm on America.&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/22/liberalism-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Scientific Leftists of the Center For Inquiry</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/21/the-scientific-leftists-of-the-center-for-inquiry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/21/the-scientific-leftists-of-the-center-for-inquiry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/21/the-scientific-leftists-of-the-center-for-inquiry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Center for Inquiry,&#160;science is the highest form of knowledge, trumping religion, intuition, and tradition, among other things. However, there are very good reasons to believe that science is not the highest&#160;form of knowledge.</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Center For Inquiry is an atheistic think tank and public policy organization whose fundamental goal appears to be using [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/21/the-scientific-leftists-of-the-center-for-inquiry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
