<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; Alan Roebuck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/author/alan-roebuck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No Evidence for God?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/no-evidence-for-god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/no-evidence-for-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atheism now has a confession of faith. Christians say &#8220;Jesus is Lord.&#8221; Moslems say &#8220;There is no God but Allah.&#8221; And English-speaking atheists now say &#8220;There is no evidence for God.&#8221; But are they correct? Preliminaries &#160; The ultimate truths cannot be proved, if the word &#8220;proved&#8221; means &#8220;established by formally valid reasoning either to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/no-evidence-for-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to Say to the Leftist Gestapo</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/09/what-to-say-to-the-leftist-gestapo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/09/what-to-say-to-the-leftist-gestapo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=12966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> Western Civilization is under the rule of the Left, and persons formally accused of &#8220;intolerance&#8221; (impiety towards liberalism) face serious persecution if convicted. Indeed, even the accusation can bring significant hardship. What can we do to defend ourselves against the Leftist Gestapo? <p class="MsoNormal">By way of illustration, consider the following scenario:</p> <p class="MsoNormal">Liberal Commissar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/09/what-to-say-to-the-leftist-gestapo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing Protestantism</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/10/23/fixing-protestantism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/10/23/fixing-protestantism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 17:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=11834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Protestant world is divided broadly into three groups: Liberal, Evangelical and Fundamentalist. But there is a fourth group, rarely identified, which holds the key to understanding the mess Protestantism has made and how it could regain its integrity. <p class="MsoNormal"></p> <p class="MsoNormal">Let&#8217;s begin by defining these groups. &#160;</p> <p class="MsoNormal">Although theological liberalism is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/10/23/fixing-protestantism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Nation That Honors Sin</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/08/05/a-nation-that-honors-sin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/08/05/a-nation-that-honors-sin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=10769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America does not just tolerate the sins loved by the Left &#8211; - Abortion, homosexuality, Balkanization through multiculturalism, and so on. Our leaders want us to love sin. <p class="MsoNormal">&#160;It is widely understood that Western Civilization &#8212; our civilization &#8212; is in an unprecedented crisis.&#160; But a crucial element of this crisis is rarely discussed: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/08/05/a-nation-that-honors-sin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Courtier&#8217;s Reply&#8221; Ploy</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/06/18/the-courtiers-reply-ploy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/06/18/the-courtiers-reply-ploy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=10219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atheists have a new tactic to avoid confronting the voluminous evidence for God: When your debate opponent catches you dismissing valid scholarship, cry &#34;Courtier&#39; Reply!&#34; <p class="MsoNormal">&#160;</p> <p class="MsoNormal">If you follow the debates on God&#39;s existence, you may have begun to hear atheists apply a new term: &#34;the Courtier&#39;s Reply[1].&#34; It usually occurs in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/06/18/the-courtiers-reply-ploy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>190</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Evangelism, Part One</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/11/11/conservative-evangelism-part-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/11/11/conservative-evangelism-part-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=9022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The liberal&#39;s basic problem is that he is participating in the false and wicked system of liberalism, a system that is dragging him and his nation down to destruction. His basic need is to hear this bad news (the truth about liberalism) and the good news of conservatism that there is a truer and better [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/11/11/conservative-evangelism-part-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Manhattan Declaration and Conservative Evangelism</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/07/29/the-manhattan-declaration-and-conservative-evangelism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/07/29/the-manhattan-declaration-and-conservative-evangelism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=8301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cultural renewal requires organizations dedicated to promoting a properly conservative understanding of society based on a proper understanding of God and man, and dedicated to getting people who have this understanding into positions of leadership. <p>On November 20, 2009 a group of prominent Catholic, Orthodox and Evangelical Christians promulgated the Manhattan Declaration, a manifesto of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/07/29/the-manhattan-declaration-and-conservative-evangelism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The False Gospel of Liberalism</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/02/01/the-false-gospel-of-liberalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/02/01/the-false-gospel-of-liberalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=7330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this gospel,&#160;liberals find both an intellectually plausible explanation for their unhappiness and psychological relief from knowing that they are now on the side of the angels. <p>How can liberalism &#8212; an egregiously false and destructive worldview &#8211;&#160;be so wildly popular? Granted, some oddballs are attracted to an idea because it&#39;s false and destructive, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/02/01/the-false-gospel-of-liberalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>183</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Against the Legal Left: An Open Letter to Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/20/the-case-against-the-legal-left-an-open-letter-to-law-professor-kermit-roosevelt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/20/the-case-against-the-legal-left-an-open-letter-to-law-professor-kermit-roosevelt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If equality is the highest good, then we must eventually allow anything to be called marriage. But if anything is marriage, then marriage equals non-marriage, and marriage has been destroyed. <p>Dear Professor Roosevelt:</p> <p>Your recent article in the Christian Science Monitor, &#34;California&#39;s Same-Sex Marriage Case Affects All of Us,&#34; presents a clear justification for leftist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/20/the-case-against-the-legal-left-an-open-letter-to-law-professor-kermit-roosevelt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theism vs Atheism: What&#8217;s at Stake</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/12/theism-vs-atheism-whats-at-stake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/12/theism-vs-atheism-whats-at-stake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Roebuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless atheists&#160;can give an account of why naturalism is true,&#160;their arguments against God all fail, and&#160;they are left with agnosticism at best. <p>My essay &#34;How to Respond to a Supercilious Atheist&#34; generated many responses from atheists and agnostics. Some were courteous, some were hostile, and a few were even supercilious.&#160; But none even came near [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/01/12/theism-vs-atheism-whats-at-stake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

