<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; David R. Usher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/author/david-r-usher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Same-Sex Marriage is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/11/24/why-same-sex-marriage-is-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/11/24/why-same-sex-marriage-is-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminist marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=12241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same sex (feminist) marriage is unconstitutional because it immediately establishes three different classes of marriage with vastly different reproductive, entitlement, parental, and taxation disparities.&#160; It is automatically a three-party marriage with government the guaranteed third party to the marriage when women marry each other and have children. This violates the 14th Amendment, and the 5th [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/11/24/why-same-sex-marriage-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook is Killing Conservative Political Action</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/09/02/facebook-is-killing-conservative-political-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/09/02/facebook-is-killing-conservative-political-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=11218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Event spamming is killing political activism on Facebook. <p> </p> <p>In its quest to invite political activism, Facebook has unleashed a river of uncontrollable event and email spam no human being can possible keep track of.&#160;</p> <p>Political activism cannot be collaboratively organized on Facebook.&#160; Those with similar interests cannot converge them into a common cause [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/09/02/facebook-is-killing-conservative-political-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archbishop Timothy Dolan blasphemes married men</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/08/24/archbishop-timothy-dolan-blasphemes-married-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/08/24/archbishop-timothy-dolan-blasphemes-married-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=11079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head of the U.S. Catholic Church blamed married men for child sexual abuse on 60 Minutes.&#160; Pro-marriage groups expect a retraction and correction. <p></p> <p class="MsoNormal">On Sunday, Archbishop Timothy Dolan appeared on 60 Minutes.&#160; He serves as the President of the U.S. Conference on Catholic Bishops, and holds great power over the thinking of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/08/24/archbishop-timothy-dolan-blasphemes-married-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Choice: Marriage or Bankrupt Big Government?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/07/18/your-choice-marriage-or-bankrupt-big-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/07/18/your-choice-marriage-or-bankrupt-big-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=10558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage-absence is the most pressing economic structural problem of our time, In less-affluent groups, it drives bloated government, endless social spending, budgets that cannot be balanced by consensus, and calls for more taxes.&#160; The Center for Marriage Policy has the policy answers. <p align="center">By David R. Usher, Representative Allen Icet, and Representative Cynthia Davis</p> <p>Marriage-absence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/07/18/your-choice-marriage-or-bankrupt-big-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten “Marriage Values” Policies to Rebuild America</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/07/10/ten-%e2%80%9cmarriage-values%e2%80%9d-policies-to-rebuild-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/07/10/ten-%e2%80%9cmarriage-values%e2%80%9d-policies-to-rebuild-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress & the Legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=10474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage-absence is the primary driver of uncontrollable deficit spending, social problems, and poverty in the United States.&#160; Our marriage values policies will stimulate marriage, resolving the greatest problems faced by unmarried mothers, taxpayers, and politicians &#8212; without forcing anyone to do anything. <p>Marriage-absence is the greatest domestic problem America faces.&#160; Our most daunting social, economic, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/07/10/ten-%e2%80%9cmarriage-values%e2%80%9d-policies-to-rebuild-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How We Can Strengthen Marriage Through Better Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/06/07/how-we-can-strengthen-marriage-through-better-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/06/07/how-we-can-strengthen-marriage-through-better-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=10069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for Marriage Policy has tools to get government out of the business of destroying marriage. <p>By David R. Usher and Representative Cynthia Davis</p> <p>Every day we read articles bemoaning the lack of marriage and complaining about marriage-destructive Progressive federal law.&#160; Now is the time to move beyond armchair hand-wringing about the demise of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/06/07/how-we-can-strengthen-marriage-through-better-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gulliver vs. Lilliputians: The Terrorist War Over Morals and Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/11/24/gulliver-vs-lilliputians-the-terrorist-war-over-morals-and-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/11/24/gulliver-vs-lilliputians-the-terrorist-war-over-morals-and-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism, War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=9115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We simply cannot afford the aggregated costs of the war on terrorism and our massive welfare state. Rebuilding a marriage culture will also obviate the leading reason why conservative Muslim countries hate our guts. <p> </p> <p>The heart of the cultural conflict between Muslims and the West revolves around morals and power-sharing between the sexes. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/11/24/gulliver-vs-lilliputians-the-terrorist-war-over-morals-and-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Republicans Will Lose in 2008, Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/11/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/11/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/11/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008-part-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those who want to know why Republicans will lose in 2008 should ask Senator John McCain.</p> <p></p> <p>Those who want to know why Republicans will lose in 2008 should ask Senator John McCain.&#160; McCain has demonstrated uncanny consistency changing the subject whenever someone asks a legitimate question on core social issues.&#160; This is the fatal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/11/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Republicans Will Lose in 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/08/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/08/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/08/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Republicans would not be playing third fiddle in a freak show if they had anything of substance for voters to chew on.</p> <p></p> <p>G.O.P party-line bombast has failed to generate the level of buzz needed to effectively counter the looming Democrat invasion on the Presidency and Congress.&#160; I do admit it is a tall order [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/08/why-republicans-will-lose-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Omen From Iowa: Obama Trumps Huckabee 2-1</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/01/07/bad-omen-from-iowa-obama-trumps-huckabee-2-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/01/07/bad-omen-from-iowa-obama-trumps-huckabee-2-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/01/07/bad-omen-from-iowa-obama-trumps-huckabee-2-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Democratic turnout in the Iowa primary was nearly double what Republicans could muster.</p> <p></p> <p>Mike Huckabee is understandably basking in his early victory, but facing a very tough row to hoe between now and Super Tuesday.&#160; Obama is on fire while Hillary&#8217;s foot is stuck in the mire.</p> <p>Notwithstanding the fact that Iowa is just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/01/07/bad-omen-from-iowa-obama-trumps-huckabee-2-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

