<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; John Williamson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/author/john-williamson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Chomsky’s Linguistic Theory Has To Be Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/08/why-chomsky%e2%80%99s-linguistic-theory-has-to-be-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/08/why-chomsky%e2%80%99s-linguistic-theory-has-to-be-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Williamson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/why-chomsky%e2%80%99s-linguistic-theory-has-to-be-wrong/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some people master all&#160;of a language&#39;s&#160;various structures relatively quickly, some get most of it but miss a few things, and some never gain much mastery over language.</p> <p>One of the problems in criticizing Chomskyan theory in linguistics is that it can be a bit . . . well, arcane. The terminology is not very accessible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/08/why-chomsky%e2%80%99s-linguistic-theory-has-to-be-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noam Chomsky: America’s Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/07/11/noam-chomsky-america%e2%80%99s-village-idiot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/07/11/noam-chomsky-america%e2%80%99s-village-idiot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Williamson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/noam-chomsky-america%e2%80%99s-village-idiot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some of&#160;Chomsky&#8217;s most important claims cannot reasonably be considered scientific achievements at all.</p> <p></p> <p>In this article I discuss the nature of scientific inquiry. I want to show that the standards of achievement for serious scientists such as the physicist Albert Einstein are far higher than those of MIT&#8217;s professor of linguistics, Noam Chomsky. In [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/07/11/noam-chomsky-america%e2%80%99s-village-idiot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noam Chomsky and the Little Green Men</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/06/13/noam-chomsky-and-the-little-green-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/06/13/noam-chomsky-and-the-little-green-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Williamson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/noam-chomsky-and-the-little-green-men/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> When you consider how much Chomsky can see in language which nobody else can seem to find,&#160;you realize the degree to which Chomsky truly is the intellectual heir of Percival Lowell.</p> <p></p> <p>Some of those who follow the career of Noam Chomsky see him as an outsize figure, larger in scale than any of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/06/13/noam-chomsky-and-the-little-green-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chomsky Speaks, West Point Yawns</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/05/14/chomsky-speaks-west-point-yawns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/05/14/chomsky-speaks-west-point-yawns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 02:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Williamson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs, National Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/chomsky-speaks-west-point-yawns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One wonders whether, when Chomsky was asked to speak at Westpoint, he recalled his statement that the Pentagon is &#34;the most hideous institution on this earth&#34; and, if so, whether he made the connection that the Pentagon has always been run by those whose values were shaped at West Point and its fellow service academies.</p> [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/05/14/chomsky-speaks-west-point-yawns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

