<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; M. Dylan McClelland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/author/m-dylan-mcclelland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Acknowledging the 4th Strike: Rethinking the Right to Inmate Healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/04/17/acknowledging-the-4th-strike-rethinking-the-right-to-inmate-healthcare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/04/17/acknowledging-the-4th-strike-rethinking-the-right-to-inmate-healthcare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Courts, Legal, Criminal Justice, Death Penalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inmate healthcare claims represent the 4th Strike&#160;&#8211; the final opportunity for the intermittent and permanent persistent offender to pillage the innocent. <p>I. Introduction</p> <p>Three strikes laws have become commonplace in America.1&#160; Often referred to as habitual offender laws, &#34;3 Strikes&#34; sentencing statutes require courts to award minimum mandatory sentences to serious offenders with prior convictions, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/04/17/acknowledging-the-4th-strike-rethinking-the-right-to-inmate-healthcare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recapturing Marriage: How Blue State Conservatism Can Reinvigorate the Pro-family, Pro-marriage Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/06/12/recapturing-marriage-how-blue-state-conservatism-can-reinvigorate-the-pro-family-pro-marriage-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/06/12/recapturing-marriage-how-blue-state-conservatism-can-reinvigorate-the-pro-family-pro-marriage-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/06/12/recapturing-marriage-how-blue-state-conservatism-can-reinvigorate-the-pro-family-pro-marriage-agenda/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California conservatives should co-opt the recent Supreme Court decision, embrace the importance of marriage as a unifying and positive institution in America, and propose a strong pro-marriage, pro-family agenda. <p></p> <p>The California Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in In re Marriage Cases, which concluded that the California Constitution required recognition of same-sex marriages, reverberated around the country.&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/06/12/recapturing-marriage-how-blue-state-conservatism-can-reinvigorate-the-pro-family-pro-marriage-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uncomfortable Distaste vs. Stability and Equality: Is there a Conservative Case for Same Sex Marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/12/04/uncomfortable-distaste-vs-stability-and-equality-is-there-a-conservative-case-for-same-sex-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/12/04/uncomfortable-distaste-vs-stability-and-equality-is-there-a-conservative-case-for-same-sex-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/uncomfortable-distaste-vs-stability-and-equality-is-there-a-conservative-case-for-same-sex-marriage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is&#160;time for conservatives to ask the question: does our moral, religious unease, distaste, or other objection to homosexuality outweigh our desire for a stable society in which the marriage and family laws encourage and enforce commitment.</p> <p></p> <p>There is likely no more contentious wedge issue in American politics than the battle over same-sex marriage.&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/12/04/uncomfortable-distaste-vs-stability-and-equality-is-there-a-conservative-case-for-same-sex-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Marriage of Bryan and Scopes’ Monkey: How Scientific Advances will Change the Course of the Values Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/11/22/the-marriage-of-bryan-and-scopes%e2%80%99-monkey-how-scientific-advances-will-change-the-course-of-the-values-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/11/22/the-marriage-of-bryan-and-scopes%e2%80%99-monkey-how-scientific-advances-will-change-the-course-of-the-values-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/the-marriage-of-bryan-and-scopes%e2%80%99-monkey-how-scientific-advances-will-change-the-course-of-the-values-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Less than a century after the famous &#34;monkey trial,&#34; America once&#160;again stands at the precipice of a traditionalist versus secularist battle over the fate of a nation and a culture.</p> <p></p> <p>We refer not to the New Jersey Supreme Court&#8217;s latest matrimonial excess.&#160; 1920&#8217;s America was immersed in the traditionalist versus secular debate popularized in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/11/22/the-marriage-of-bryan-and-scopes%e2%80%99-monkey-how-scientific-advances-will-change-the-course-of-the-values-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winning Matters: Policies and Politics for Blue State Conservatives</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/27/winning-matters-policies-and-politics-for-blue-state-conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/27/winning-matters-policies-and-politics-for-blue-state-conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/winning-matters-policies-and-politics-for-blue-state-conservatives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Governing is about compromise.&#160; Politics is about winning.&#160; And Conservative progress requires both.</p> <p>America is not a collection of red and blue states.&#160; Numerous &#8220;blue&#8221; states actually compromise many red voters.&#160; For example, California and New York, long considered safe blue states, are both minded by Republican governors, and contain many consistently red counties merely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/27/winning-matters-policies-and-politics-for-blue-state-conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strangled by my Bootstraps: Confessions of a Disabled Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/14/strangled-by-my-bootstraps-confessions-of-a-disabled-conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/14/strangled-by-my-bootstraps-confessions-of-a-disabled-conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment, Animal Rights, Health Issues, & Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/strangled-by-my-bootstraps-confessions-of-a-disabled-conservative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No government program can replicate the respect and hope borne from the blessings and, yes, tragedies of life.</p> <p></p> <p>The stereotypical image of the Republican Party is that of defender of wealth and privilege, friend of corporate America.&#160; This image is no doubt fostered because the GOP takes startling positions such as low taxes are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/09/14/strangled-by-my-bootstraps-confessions-of-a-disabled-conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s the Entitlements Stupid: Rethinking the Immigration Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/04/10/it%e2%80%99s-the-entitlements-stupid-rethinking-the-immigration-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/04/10/it%e2%80%99s-the-entitlements-stupid-rethinking-the-immigration-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/it%e2%80%99s-the-entitlements-stupid-rethinking-the-immigration-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If conservatives are adept enough to recognize the opportunity to win not only the Latino vote, but public policy gains long out of reach, then the GOP can become a permanent majority. Or, it can ignore the prospects for inclusion, opportunity, and success, and drive over the cliff on an overly constrictive &#34;enforcement only&#34; truck.</p> [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/04/10/it%e2%80%99s-the-entitlements-stupid-rethinking-the-immigration-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dangerous Liaisons: The Left&#8217;s New Love Affair with  Article I</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/03/22/dangerous-liaisons-the-lefts-new-love-affair-with-article-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/03/22/dangerous-liaisons-the-lefts-new-love-affair-with-article-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M. Dylan McClelland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/dangerous-liaisons-the-lefts-new-love-affair-with-article-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Left&#8217;s recent attempts to subordinate the President&#8217;s Article II war powers constitute not only an attempt to co-opt powers expressly granted to the Executive Branch under the U.S. Constitution, but also mark a shift away from the legal orthodoxy in which constitutional rights serve to invalidate undesirable state or federal legislation.</p> <p></p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>2006 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/03/22/dangerous-liaisons-the-lefts-new-love-affair-with-article-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

