<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; Robert Higgs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/author/robert-higgs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Less Government Spending Would Mean Less Economic Trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/07/02/why-less-government-spending-would-mean-less-economic-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/07/02/why-less-government-spending-would-mean-less-economic-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/07/02/why-less-government-spending-would-mean-less-economic-trouble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many economists say deficit spending is crucial to keeping the economy moving. But history tells a different story. <p></p> <p>Though our current economic troubles are complex, many mainstream economists have endorsed the simplistic Keynesian theory that massive government spending will produce jobs and prosperity.</p> <p>From such Keynesian thinking have flowed the &#34;stimulus&#34; and bailout measures [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/07/02/why-less-government-spending-would-mean-less-economic-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense Spending Is Much Greater than You Think</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/04/20/defense-spending-is-much-greater-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/04/20/defense-spending-is-much-greater-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs, National Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=7730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few Americans appreciate that the total amount of all defense-related spending greatly exceeds the amount budgeted for the Department of Defense. <p>When President Obama presented his budget recently for fiscal year 2011, he proposed that the Pentagon&#39;s outlays be increased by about 4.5 percent beyond its estimated outlays in fiscal 2010, to a total of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/04/20/defense-spending-is-much-greater-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Current Recovery a Pinata with No Candy Inside?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/03/17/is-the-current-recovery-a-pinata-with-no-candy-inside/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/03/17/is-the-current-recovery-a-pinata-with-no-candy-inside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=7592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent changes give little warrant to the expectation of a full, sustainable recovery in the near term. <p>Many commentators would have us believe that the economy hit bottom in the second quarter of 2009, and afterward commenced a recovery, albeit a &#34;jobless&#34; one, as employment continued to decline. The main reason for believing in this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2010/03/17/is-the-current-recovery-a-pinata-with-no-candy-inside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mommas, Don’t Let Your Babies Grow Up to Report on the Government’s Financial Reforms</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/06/16/mommas-don%e2%80%99t-let-your-babies-grow-up-to-report-on-the-government%e2%80%99s-financial-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/06/16/mommas-don%e2%80%99t-let-your-babies-grow-up-to-report-on-the-government%e2%80%99s-financial-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=6160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you do, they will almost certainly disgrace your family. <p class="entry">If you do, they will almost certainly disgrace your family by writing reports that can be interpreted in only two ways: (1) the reporter is a shill for the government, passing off government propaganda as news and analysis; and (2) the reporter is dreadfully [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/06/16/mommas-don%e2%80%99t-let-your-babies-grow-up-to-report-on-the-government%e2%80%99s-financial-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jesus on Property Rights and Resource Preservation</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/05/07/jesus-on-property-rights-and-resource-preservation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/05/07/jesus-on-property-rights-and-resource-preservation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 11:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#39;t care for economic theory or econometrics, just read the Bible. <p>When I began my academic career, I was fortunate to work in a department of economics in which several of my colleagues, including Yoram Barzel, Steven N. S. Cheung, and Douglass C. North, had a keen interest in property rights and their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/05/07/jesus-on-property-rights-and-resource-preservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Do Progressives Love Trains?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/04/22/why-do-progressives-love-trains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/04/22/why-do-progressives-love-trains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A&#160;substantial contingent of Democrats seems to love passenger-rail subsidies for reasons that have little or nothing to do with pork for their friends. <p></p> <p>The headline reads &#34;Obama&#39;s Rail Plan Speeds Ahead,&#34; and the article explains that President Obama has &#34;unveiled his plan to develop a high-speed passenger rail (HSR) system in the United States.&#34; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/04/22/why-do-progressives-love-trains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give Bernanke Credit—For Chutzpah</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/give-bernanke-credit%e2%80%94for-chutzpah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/give-bernanke-credit%e2%80%94for-chutzpah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In view of the Fed&#39;s fundamental, if wholly unacknowledged, role&#160;in bringing about the world&#39;s present economic&#160;debacle,&#160; the question that Bernanke&#39;s current proposals immediately raise could not be more obvious: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?&#160; <p>In my mind&#39;s eye, I envision a street fair&#8211; one of those happy community gatherings at which sellers of handcrafted ceramics, funky [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/give-bernanke-credit%e2%80%94for-chutzpah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession and Recovery: Six Fundamental Errors of the Current Orthodoxy</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/15/recession-and-recovery-six-fundamental-errors-of-the-current-orthodoxy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/15/recession-and-recovery-six-fundamental-errors-of-the-current-orthodoxy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vulgar Keynesianism, which purports to be an economic model or at least a coherent framework of economic analysis, actually excludes the very possibility of genuine economic action, substituting for it a simple, mechanical conception, the intellectual equivalent of a baby toy. <p></p> <p>As the recession has deepened and the financial debacle has passed from one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/15/recession-and-recovery-six-fundamental-errors-of-the-current-orthodoxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Would Be Cheaper to Fight World War II Again</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/06/it-would-be-cheaper-to-fight-world-war-ii-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/06/it-would-be-cheaper-to-fight-world-war-ii-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/06/it-would-be-cheaper-to-fight-world-war-ii-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama promises that the deficit will be brought down to $1,170 billion in fiscal year 2010. Don&#39;t bank on it. <p></p> <p>What is the&#160;right word to describe the U.S. government&#39;s current and proposed&#160;fiscal condition: fantastic, unbelievable, surreal? The Obama administration now expects&#160;a budget deficit&#160;in fiscal year 2009 of $1,750 billion,&#160;or&#160;more than 12 percent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/06/it-would-be-cheaper-to-fight-world-war-ii-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>These Projects Are Shovel-Ready, All Right</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/03/these-projects-are-shovel-ready-all-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/03/these-projects-are-shovel-ready-all-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Higgs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democrats are using the alleged crisis as the pretext for a monumental looting of the taxpayers. <p></p> <p>I&#39;ve been a little too busy to read the 647-page &#34;stimulus&#34; bill the House just approved and the Senate is set to consider. So, for the moment, I must rely on what others, such as the Wall [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/03/these-projects-are-shovel-ready-all-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

