<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; Family Issues, Homosexuality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/category/family-issues-homosexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brian Ross is a Dope… a Diva he is Not</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/30/brian-ross-is-a-dope%e2%80%a6-a-diva-he-is-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/30/brian-ross-is-a-dope%e2%80%a6-a-diva-he-is-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Phil Taverna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama has been hiding stuff for about five years. How come goons like Ross are not out there interviewing Obama&#8217;s classmates? ABC has always been part of the liberal media entourage. It reminded me of the days of Dan Rather when he saw evidence where there was no evidence. That&#8217;s when the right side of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/30/brian-ross-is-a-dope%e2%80%a6-a-diva-he-is-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Libertarianism is a Redundancy and Conservatism is Still the Answer</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/why-libertarianism-is-a-redundancy-and-conservatism-is-still-the-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/why-libertarianism-is-a-redundancy-and-conservatism-is-still-the-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Alexander</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ayn Rand made a couple of fair points, but failed to grasp the deep longing most people have to live a noble life. They do not wish to live just for themselves. The influence of the &#8220;libertarian wing&#8221; of the Republican Party proves a few things. &#160; In the last thirty years, many Republicans have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/why-libertarianism-is-a-redundancy-and-conservatism-is-still-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kathleen Sebelius vs. Religious Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/24/kathleen-sebelius-vs-religious-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/24/kathleen-sebelius-vs-religious-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>National Review Editorial Board</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment, Animal Rights, Health Issues, & Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration&#39;s new HHS contraception mandate is an &#34;attack on conscience&#34; and &#34;a direct assault on the religious freedom of individuals and institutions.&#34; America&#39;s Catholic bishops and others should be commended for fighting this mandate. <p></p> Last August, under authority granted by Obamacare, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius published an &#8220;interim [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/24/kathleen-sebelius-vs-religious-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Can We Learn From Popular TV?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/20/what-can-we-learn-from-popular-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/20/what-can-we-learn-from-popular-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 03:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Horowitz, M.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Hollywood, Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Explaining the behavior of men and women featured on the Jerry Springer show. <p> If one observes the Jerry Springer and Judge Judy programs, not as a member of the contemptuous imported &#34;bread and circuses&#34; young audience, but as a professional, curious about the stunning repetitious behavior of the &#34;subjects&#34;, a serious need for explanation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/20/what-can-we-learn-from-popular-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives Get Stupid, Again</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/19/conservatives-get-stupid-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/19/conservatives-get-stupid-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post is back to: Liberals = Smart and Conservatives = Dumb. Conservative Christians are &#34;poor, educated and easily led.&#34; <p></p> <p>What a let down. Here conservative Republicans were so close to respectability and even acceptance in polite society. In Prince William County, VA where I live, conservatives convinced themselves we&#8217;d come far from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/19/conservatives-get-stupid-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Is Andrew Sullivan So Dumb?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/19/why-is-andrew-sullivan-so-dumb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/19/why-is-andrew-sullivan-so-dumb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Lela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan calls Obama&#39;s critics &#34;dumb.&#34; But perhaps he is the dumb one for comparing homosexuality to race. &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; On the cover of the latest Newsweek (Jan. 23) are these words: &#34;Why Are Obama&#39;s Critics So Dumb?&#34; The piece was written by Andrew Sullivan. That&#39;s basically an open invitation for someone to write a piece [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/19/why-is-andrew-sullivan-so-dumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mother Government</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/18/mother-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/18/mother-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take note of how many children today are supported by government. Since government pays for their pre-natal care, birth, medical insurance, food, etc., why wouldn&#39;t government be considered their mother? <p></p> &#160; As government continues to grow by leaps and bounds, more demands of ownership are exercised, both on the national and state level. This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/18/mother-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Left&#8217;s Heart of Darkness</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/09/the-lefts-heart-of-darkness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/09/the-lefts-heart-of-darkness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism, Abortion, Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=12981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Santorum should not be mocked, but should be commended for bringing his critically ill newborn son Gabriel into the world, giving him a chance at life. Instead, the left mocks those on the right who try to uphold good family values. &#160; On January 2nd, Alan Colmes on Fox News mocked Santorum for bringing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/09/the-lefts-heart-of-darkness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penguins &#8216;Pray Away the Gay&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/12/23/penguins-pray-away-the-gay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/12/23/penguins-pray-away-the-gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Barber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=12680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if there are gay penguins, so what? There are plenty of species in the world that eat their young, too. Animals are animals. Does this mean we should act like them? <p></p> &#160; Those bent on justifying the homosexual lifestyle often claim that there are umpteen million &#8211; or somewhere thereabouts &#8211; species of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/12/23/penguins-pray-away-the-gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frankly Barney, You Won’t Be Missed</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/12/05/frankly-barney-you-won%e2%80%99t-be-missed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/12/05/frankly-barney-you-won%e2%80%99t-be-missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress & the Legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Issues, Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews & Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[term limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=12373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barney Frank is morally, politically and ethically corrupt. His longevity is a product of a gerrymandered district that made him impervious to public opinion. <p></p> <p>When I learned Cong. Barney Frank (D&#8211;Libertine) was retiring after 30 years in the House, my first thought was don&#8217;t let the door hit you in the behind. That&#8217;s because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/12/05/frankly-barney-you-won%e2%80%99t-be-missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

