<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intellectual Conservative Politics and Philosophy &#187; Paleoconservatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/category/neocons-paleocons/paleoconservatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul in 2012: Defeat the Elites!</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/27/ron-paul-in-2012-defeat-the-elites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/27/ron-paul-in-2012-defeat-the-elites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim O'Neill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs, National Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neocons & Paleocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Paul has a broad base of support and is the only GOP presidential candidate who is not a neocon. &#34;The increasing complexity and precariousness of our economic life have forced Government to take over many spheres of activity once left to choice or chance. Our intellectuals have surrendered first to the slave-philosophy of Hegel, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/27/ron-paul-in-2012-defeat-the-elites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has The American Conservative Gone Liberal?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/has-the-american-conservative-gone-liberal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/has-the-american-conservative-gone-liberal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neocons & Paleocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The general gestalt sense in paleo and even mainstream circles has been that TAC is trying hard to appeal to establishment critics of conservatism, left, right and center. It is no longer discernibly paleoconservative and employs non-conservatives. Recently, The American Conservative (TAC) brought Noah Millman on board as a blogger. By Millman&#8217;s own admission, he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/25/has-the-american-conservative-gone-liberal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Ron Paul is Unelectable</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/15/why-ron-paul-is-unelectable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/15/why-ron-paul-is-unelectable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JB Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs, National Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism, War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=13075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most Americans share the goal of defeating Obama at any cost. They will have to do it without Paul supporters, who seem to have a very different kind of moral compass. <p></p> &#160; First, I must state that I deeply appreciate and applaud the passion and energy of the Ron Paul campaign and their undying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/15/why-ron-paul-is-unelectable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Le Besoin de Voir Clair: A Plea for a Non-Tribal Discussion of National Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/08/le-besoin-de-voir-clair-a-plea-for-a-non-tribal-discussion-of-national-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/08/le-besoin-de-voir-clair-a-plea-for-a-non-tribal-discussion-of-national-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues, Civil Liberty & Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs, National Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs: Foreign Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs: Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neocons & Paleocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism, War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=12940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a week ago, Katie Kieffer dared to ask a few questions of the sort I have in mind on Townhall.com, tentatively advancing the proposition that Ron Paul is not entirely insane. Directly opposing her signature photo on the Townhall homepage was the equally lovely visage of Star Parker&#8212;whose column charged Paul supporters with being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/08/le-besoin-de-voir-clair-a-plea-for-a-non-tribal-discussion-of-national-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul’s Support Among Military?  4.4% &#8230; At Best</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/07/ron-paul%e2%80%99s-support-among-military-4-4-at-best/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/07/ron-paul%e2%80%99s-support-among-military-4-4-at-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. J. Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism, War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=12914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Much of Ron Paul&#39;s support is manufactured; like emails coming from the same guy using different email addresses. <p></p> Ron Paul&#8217;s supporters are diligent in their support of him.&#160;Unfortunately, a lot of that support is what is known in the software industry as vaporware.&#160;In other words it is phony to non-existent.&#160;Right now, for example, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2012/01/07/ron-paul%e2%80%99s-support-among-military-4-4-at-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Wall Street: Contempt Of Political Class</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/10/11/occupy-wall-street-contempt-of-political-class/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/10/11/occupy-wall-street-contempt-of-political-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Benko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ. & Public Policy, Science, Technology, Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections & Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left Wing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=11762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the populist left and the populist right align, as they well may, we may be on the cusp of a Constitutional Realignment, or, stated plainly: really throwing the bums out. <p></p> &#160; Last Wednesday, Occupy Wall Street, known at Twitter as #OWS, surged, thanks to a boost from MoveOn.org, to 15,000 souls. That same [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/10/11/occupy-wall-street-contempt-of-political-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey Lord Gets Conservatism Wrong Again</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/09/13/jeffrey-lord-gets-conservatism-wrong-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/09/13/jeffrey-lord-gets-conservatism-wrong-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 04:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[
	
Politics: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture: General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neocons & Paleocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=11362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of our writers have problems with neoconservatism at the American Spectator. <p></p> &#160; Jeffrey Lord is at it again at American Spectator. Apparently the man is a glutton for intellectual punishment. After his last anti-Ron Paul screed generated so many comments they had to be shut down, and after having his sloppy history demolished [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/09/13/jeffrey-lord-gets-conservatism-wrong-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Are You?</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/02/20/who-are-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/02/20/who-are-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Ellis Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neocons & Paleocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/who-are-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paleoconservatism is more than a political philosophy.&#160; It is a religion.</p> <p></p> <p>To my ongoing surprise and amazement, who I am appears to be as divisive a topic of discussion at&#160;IntellectualConservative.com as what it is I write. </p> <p>Now on one level I&#38;rsquo;m not surprised.&#160; I have a history of making extremely divisive and controversial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/02/20/who-are-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Became a Liberal in 12 Seconds</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/02/12/how-i-became-a-liberal-in-12-seconds-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/02/12/how-i-became-a-liberal-in-12-seconds-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven J. Sabin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neocons & Paleocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/how-i-became-a-liberal-in-12-seconds-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paleoconservatism demands substantial alignment with its tenets before one can claim to be a &#8220;true&#8221; conservative.&#160; My fall from grace took mere seconds.</p> <p></p> <p>This morning as I shaved the same face I&#8217;ve been shaving for the past 45 years (actually, 30 years, since I didn&#8217;t start shaving until I was 15), I was forced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/02/12/how-i-became-a-liberal-in-12-seconds-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Heck is a Paleoconservative and Why You Should Care</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/12/08/what-the-heck-is-a-paleoconservative-and-why-you-should-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/12/08/what-the-heck-is-a-paleoconservative-and-why-you-should-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Phillips</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neocons & Paleocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory, Humanities, Language, Academia, Histo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/what-the-heck-is-a-paleoconservative-and-why-you-should-care/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paleoconservatism is informed by certain philosophical presumptions that differ markedly from the presumptions of neocons and most modern conservatives.</p> <p></p> <p>Have you ever noticed how enthusiasts of all sorts frequently speak a language that is completely unintelligible to the rest of us? For example, computer geeks . . . err . . . enthusiasts have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/12/08/what-the-heck-is-a-paleoconservative-and-why-you-should-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

