So Black Power Liberals Wish to Resegregate? It Will Cost Them Dearly, As in Being Targeted for Population Control


“I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world — that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin — that people can — can commit.”
— Margaret Sanger, in a 1957 interview with Mike Wallace

I know now Jim Crow is alive and well in the Democratic Party. In fact, he never died, but metastasized into a far more insidious form of advocacy for “separate but equal” laws. Such racists supportive of eugenics policies for poor, underprivileged blacks in inner cities have mastered the art of political indoctrination, for they convince them, a caste largely uneducated and broadly illiterate for all intents and purposes, if they continue to vote for them, they will not only be heavily subsidized with more money to sustain their sub-African Global South standard for morbid poverty, they will ensure that as many of their children in the future as is possible can be aborted since it is compassionate to eradicate their entire race due to their condition. Democrats have mastered the art of B.S. in a manner neither Adolf Hitler nor V.I. Lenin could ever have imagined their bellicose rhetoric portend. In this sense, the power of the Nazi liberal putsch of America has embarked on a vigorous push towards population control not just here, but through the United Nations (UN), which for all intents and purposes we own due to providing nearly one-third its funds. New York City councilwoman Laurie Cumbo wants to segregate neighborhoods based on race. Apparently, Democrats are not content to simply be the tortoise, a slow poke who will at least will reach the finish line.

What other marvelous excuse for global socialism might be employed but the scam of all scams, climate change, or better still by its true moniker, “global warming”? That interview conducted by Climate One founder Greg Dalton with Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Christiana Figueres in 2013 is now viral over YouTube, igniting outrage in revisiting the legacy of history’s two paramount advocates of eugenics: Margaret Sanger, the most revered political giant internationally among the militant feminist fringe; and Adolf Hitler, for whom the UN was created to avoid another dictator to rise again to embark upon another Holocaust. It was recently reproduced in Progressives Today.


DALTON: A related issue is fertility rates in population. A lot of people in energy and environmental circles don’t wanna go near that because it’s politically charged. It’s not their issue. But isn’t it true that stopping the rise of the population would be one of the biggest levers and driving the rise of greenhouse gases?

FIGUERES: I mean we all know that we expect nine billion, right, by 2050. So, yes, obviously less people would exert less pressure on the natural resources.

DALTON: So is nine billion a forgone conclusion? That’s like baked in, done, no way to change that?

FIGUERES: Well there again, there is pressure in the system to go toward that; we can definitely change those, right? We can definitely change those numbers and really should make every effort to change those numbers because we are already, today, already exceeding the planet’s planetary carrying capacity, today. To say nothing of adding more population that is really going to overextend our capacity. So yes we should do everything possible. But we cannot fall into the very simplistic opinion of saying just by curtailing population then we’ve solved the problem. It is not either/or, it is an and/also.

Sanger advocated such a policy be conducted through a global population congress, which the Clintons have in place with the Global Climate Initiative and with respect to the UN, the World Health Organization (WHO), which conveniently blamed the Western developed nations for Ebola and AIDS when it was the recipient of billions in cash, but not one cent in contribution to the greater good of health care other than massive depopulation through diseases curiously ignored for decades. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) receives funding from the U.S. despite its complicity promoting China’s “One Child Policy”. Intriguingly, she called for a ten year moratorium on the birth of babies.


But few realize Sanger advocated segregating the global population based on race and health, whether or not a person was disabled both physically and mentally. Such racist rhetoric was part of her landmark A Plan for Peace where she advocated to be part of President Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points at the conclusion of World War I the following.

First, put into action President Wilson’s fourteen points, upon which terms Germany and Austria surrendered to the Allies in 1918.

Second, have Congress set up a special department for the study of population problems and appoint a Parliament of Population, the directors representing the various branches of science: this body to direct and control the population through birth rates and immigration, and to direct its distribution over the country according to national needs consistent with taste, fitness and interest of individuals. The main objects of the Population Congress would be:

  1. to raise the level and increase the general intelligence of population.
  2. to increase the population slowly by keeping the birth rate at its present level of fifteen per thousand, decreasing the death rate below its present mark of 11 per thousand.
  3. to keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924.
  4. to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.
  5. to insure the country against future burdens of maintenance for numerous offspring as may be born of feeble minded parents, by pensioning all persons with transmissible disease who voluntarily consent to sterilization.
  6. to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.
  7. to apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives.

The first step would thus be to control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.

The second step would be to take an inventory of the secondary group such as illiterates, paupers, unemployables, criminals, prostitutes, dope-fiends; classify them in special departments under government medical protection, and segregate them on farms and open spaces as long as necessary for the strengthening and development of moral conduct.

Having corralled this enormous part of our population and placed it on a basis of health instead of punishment, it is safe to say that fifteen or twenty millions of our population would then be organized into soldiers of defense—defending the unborn against their own disabilities.

The third step would be to give special attention to the mother’s’ health, to see that women who are suffering from tuberculosis, heart or kidney disease, toxic goitre, gonorrhea, or any disease where the condition of pregnancy disturbs their health are placed under public health nurses to instruct them in practical, scientific methods of contraception in order to safeguard their lives—thus reducing maternal mortality.

The above steps may seem to place emphasis on a health program instead of on tariffs, moratoriums and debts, but I believe that national health is the first essential factor in any program for universal peace.

With the future citizen safeguarded from hereditary taints, with five million mental and moral degenerates segregated, with ten million women and ten million children receiving adequate care, we could then turn our attention to the basic needs for international peace.

There would then be a definite effort to make population increase slowly and at a specified rate, in order to accommodate and adjust increasing numbers to the best social and economic system.

In the meantime we should organize and join an International League of Low Birth Rate Nations to secure and maintain World Peace.

Summary of address before the New History Society, January 17th, New York City

Sanger’s standards are rather frightening, and would appear to target racially those Democrats proclaim to champion, subject to abrogation:


  1. “Borderline  cases”  –  “a  greater  menace”  =  39.2%
  2. “Morons”  –  Sterilize  and  Segregate  =  47.3%
  3. “Thoroughbreds”  –  Allowed  to  Reproduce  =  13.5%

As for Hitler? The following line could have been Sanger as his ghost writer, as he himself was a failed artist:

“This is in keeping with the humanitarianism which, to avoid hurting one individual, let’s a hundred others perish. The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring is the demand of the greatest reason and if systematically executed represents the most humanitarian act of mankind.”
— Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Chapter 10 (1925)

If the black power fascists truly believe Democrats’ resegregating America is a viable solution to racial inequality and peace, it needs badly to reevaluate its position, to reread history texts that are unrevised and inform instead based on empirical facts. In fact Sanger’s infamous correspondence with Dr. Clarence Gamble (founder, Proctor and Gamble) who initiated the talks regarding The Negro Project supports the UN’s present initiative for population control, as well as how:

“I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full-time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience … that, while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table, which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and … knowledge, which … will have far-reaching results among the colored people.”

Another project director lamented:

“I wonder if Southern Darkies can ever be entrusted with … a clinic. Our experience causes us to doubt their ability to work except under white supervision.”

And the incriminating reply by Sanger herself:

“The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach.We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Britain’s Fabian Society socialist Sidney Webb bluntly described the role of the minimum wage:

“Legal Minimum Wage positively increases the productivity of the nation’s industry, by ensuring that the surplus of unemployed workmen shall be exclusively the least efficient workmen; or, to put it in another way, by ensuring that all the situations shall be filled by the most efficient operatives who are available… What would be the result of a Legal Minimum Wage on the employer’s persistent desire to use boy labor, girl labor, married women’s labor, the labor of old men, of the feeble-minded, of the decrepit and broken-down invalids and all the other alternatives to the engagement of competent male adult workers at a full Standard Rate? … To put it shortly, all such labor is parasitic on other classes of the community, and is at present employed in this way only because it is parasitic… The unemployable, to put it bluntly, do not and cannot under any circumstances earn their keep. What we have to do with them is to see that as few as possible of them are produced.”

Henry Rogers Seager of Columbia University (later president of the American Economic Society) penned The Theory of the Minimum Wage in 1913, published in American Labor Legislative Review:

“The operation of the minimum wage requirement would merely extend the definition of defectives to embrace all individuals, who even after having received special training, remain incapable of adequate self-support… If we are to maintain a race that is to be made of up of capable, efficient and independent individuals and family groups we must courageously cut off lines of heredity that have been proved to be undesirable by isolation or sterilization.”

Eventually to serve as President Wilson’s labor commissioner, Princeton University’s Royal Meeker described what America’s policy for the minimum wage must be geared towards:

“It is much better to enact a minimum-wage law even if it deprives these unfortunates of work. Better that the state should support the inefficient wholly and prevent the multiplication of the breed than subsidize incompetence and unthrift, enabling them to bring forth more of their kind.”

Finally in quoting Frank Taussig, author of Principles of Economics (1911), asked “How to deal with the unemployable?” His answer was below:

“We have not reached the stage where we can proceed to chloroform them once and for all; but at least they can be segregated, shut up in refuges and asylums, and prevented from propagating their kind.

What are the possibilities of employing at the prescribed wages all the healthy able-bodied who apply? The persons affected by such legislation would be those in the lowest economic and social group. The wages at which they can find employment depend on the prices at which their product will sell on the open market; or in the technical language of modern economics, on the marginal utility of their services. All those whose additional product would so depress prices that the minimum could no longer be paid by employers would have to go without employment. It might be practicable to prevent employers from paying any one less than the minimum; though the power of law must be very strong indeed, and very rigidly exercised, in order to prevent the making of bargains which are welcome to both bargainers.”

John Locke (1632-1704), English philosopher and physician regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers, known as the "Father of Classical Liberalism"

John Locke (1632-1704), English philosopher and physician regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers, known as the “Father of Classical Liberalism”

The minimum wage only addresses the problem of poverty and absolute egalitarianism by ensuring those who are already poor, grow more so, that poverty will expand for purposes of political expediency. No one has ever grown more prosperous by siphoning off those taxed beyond their capacity to pay. A fixed minimum wage only ensures upward mobility is impossible through an artificial wage floor set by government. John Locke in his Second Treatise of Civil Government (1690) stated the natural rights of mankind to be as follows:

“The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all  equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions….”                    
— John Locke. The Second Treatise of Civil Government. 1690. 

Not coincidentally, Barack Obama appointed Dr. John Holdren, author of the book on population reduction and control through eugenics Ecoscience (1976), as his science czar. A documentary on some of his concepts is below.


In 2010, Rep. John Sarbanes (D-MD) told at a “Sustainability Education Summit” hosted by the U.S. Education Department on Tuesday that environmental education in schools can “promote the agenda” of climate change and population growth through the influence it has on children. His words are below:

“Like I keep saying over and over again, if you get young people invested in those ideas early on, that will result in those kinds of positive policy developments… So, whether it’s climate change, whether it’s population growth, whether it’s all these factors that impact the health of our world, raising that awareness early among young people is only going to promote the agenda.”

Ultra liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg supports the premise for Roe v. Wade (1973) as a measure for population control through eugenics. Specifically stated the following:

Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion.

To Democrats and the world of left-wing politicians, no one has the right to life. In Nancy Pelosi’s own words, babies are economic burdens which must be prevented:

“Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.”

For verification on the intention of Sanger’s legacy Planned Parenthood, here is a video specifically discussing abortions specifically targeting black babies.


And according to Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Council Arina Grossu in her op-ed for The Washington Times, the following statistics of the left-wing fringe thriving and profiting handsomely off the targeted abortions of black babies is below:

  • 79 percent Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are located within walking distance of black or Hispanic communities.
  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Abortion Surveillance report revealed that between 2007 and 2010, nearly 36 percent of all abortions in the United States were performed on black children, even though black Americans make up only 13 percent of our population.
  • A further 21 percent of abortions were performed on Hispanics, and 7 percent more on other minority groups, for a total of 64 percent of U.S. abortions tragically performed on minority groups.

Man is not born to be subjugated as slaves. The matter this still transpires globally is an abomination. But indeed this is the price the black community paid once its people sold their souls under the pretext of a false provision of security. Once Jonathan Gruber stated he intended his economic model for Obamacare to target the poor for eradication, the leopard was discovered he never shed his spots at all. Future black babies segregated into the ghettos of large inner-cities will be forgotten as little else but those sucked from the womb with vacuums as “marginal children” for the “social good”, preventing the inevitability of their commission of crimes. 


That monthly welfare check to secure a home in housing projects in the ghettos of inner cities might cause what precious little common sense exist among the black community to grow more pervasive rather than die amid their encouraged parasitical idleness, as the lessons from history how such ghettos mitigated the Gestapo’s rounding up Jews for their three-hour tour in box cars to their local concentration camps never dawned on them since Common Core likely banned it from the curriculum.

Comments are closed.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner